Search a number
-
+
3132033221 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1011101010101111…
…0000100011000101
322002021110202212102
42322223300203011
522403300030341
61234442201445
7140420562122
oct27253604305
98067422772
103132033221
111367a50a09
12734ab3285
133abb625c5
14219d75749
15134e74c9b
hexbaaf08c5

3132033221 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3132033222. Its totient is φ = 3132033220.

The previous prime is 3132033209. The next prime is 3132033253. The reversal of 3132033221 is 1223302313.

3132033221 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 2941869121 + 190164100 = 54239^2 + 13790^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 3132033221 - 230 = 2058291397 is a prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 3132033193 and 3132033202.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3132033271) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1566016610 + 1566016611.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1566016611).

Almost surely, 23132033221 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

3132033221 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

3132033221 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

3132033221 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 648, while the sum is 20.

The square root of 3132033221 is about 55964.5711231668. The cubic root of 3132033221 is about 1463.1048613172.

Adding to 3132033221 its reverse (1223302313), we get a palindrome (4355335534).

The spelling of 3132033221 in words is "three billion, one hundred thirty-two million, thirty-three thousand, two hundred twenty-one".