Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1110100011101101001110… |
… | …11111000111101101101111 |
3 | 11012100102200000221120110011 |
4 | 13101312213133013231233 |
5 | 13144001014002211343 |
6 | 152030354523554051 |
7 | 6512606653336522 |
oct | 721664737075557 |
9 | 135312600846404 |
10 | 32013201210223 |
11 | a2227a4556532 |
12 | 371045838b927 |
13 | 14b2aa79643cc |
14 | 7c96391c0bb9 |
15 | 3a7b0bc0129d |
hex | 1d1da77c7b6f |
32013201210223 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 32013201210224. Its totient is φ = 32013201210222.
The previous prime is 32013201210161. The next prime is 32013201210227. The reversal of 32013201210223 is 32201210231023.
It is a strong prime.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 32013201210223 - 229 = 32012664339311 is a prime.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 32013201210194 and 32013201210203.
It is a congruent number.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (32013201210227) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 16006600605111 + 16006600605112.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (16006600605112).
Almost surely, 232013201210223 is an apocalyptic number.
32013201210223 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
32013201210223 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
32013201210223 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 864, while the sum is 22.
Adding to 32013201210223 its reverse (32201210231023), we get a palindrome (64214411441246).
The spelling of 32013201210223 in words is "thirty-two trillion, thirteen billion, two hundred one million, two hundred ten thousand, two hundred twenty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.090 sec. • engine limits •