Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111111000100… |
… | …1100010100110 |
3 | 2022020002110000 |
4 | 1332021202212 |
5 | 31431203342 |
6 | 3140442130 |
7 | 551040504 |
oct | 176114246 |
9 | 68202400 |
10 | 33069222 |
11 | 1773743a |
12 | b0a9346 |
13 | 6b0acb4 |
14 | 456b674 |
15 | 2d8344c |
hex | 1f898a6 |
33069222 has 40 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 76665600. Its totient is φ = 10641456.
The previous prime is 33069121. The next prime is 33069227. The reversal of 33069222 is 22296033.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (27).
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (33069227) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 19 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1179 + ... + 8217.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1916640).
Almost surely, 233069222 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 33069222, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (38332800).
33069222 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (43596378).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
33069222 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
33069222 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 7082 (or 7073 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3888, while the sum is 27.
The square root of 33069222 is about 5750.5844920321. The cubic root of 33069222 is about 320.9775510548.
The spelling of 33069222 in words is "thirty-three million, sixty-nine thousand, two hundred twenty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.071 sec. • engine limits •