Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10011101101110… |
… | …110100011101001 |
3 | 212001102201112012 |
4 | 103231312203221 |
5 | 1134140141144 |
6 | 52453525305 |
7 | 11124433505 |
oct | 2355664351 |
9 | 761381465 |
10 | 330787049 |
11 | 15a7a222a |
12 | 92943835 |
13 | 536ba0a8 |
14 | 31d09305 |
15 | 1e090e9e |
hex | 13b768e9 |
330787049 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 330787050. Its totient is φ = 330787048.
The previous prime is 330787033. The next prime is 330787063. The reversal of 330787049 is 940787033.
It is a strong prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 320159449 + 10627600 = 17893^2 + 3260^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 330787049 - 24 = 330787033 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×3307870492 = 218840143572256802, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 330786997 and 330787015.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (330787069) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 165393524 + 165393525.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (165393525).
Almost surely, 2330787049 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
330787049 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
330787049 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
330787049 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 127008, while the sum is 41.
The square root of 330787049 is about 18187.5520342898. The cubic root of 330787049 is about 691.5912647727.
The spelling of 330787049 in words is "three hundred thirty million, seven hundred eighty-seven thousand, forty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.077 sec. • engine limits •