Search a number
-
+
441626131 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11010010100101…
…010111000010011
31010202222221011101
4122110222320103
51401024014011
6111453325231
713641521512
oct3224527023
91122887141
10441626131
11207317281
12103a96817
137065734b
144291c679
1528b872c1
hex1a52ae13

441626131 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 441626132. Its totient is φ = 441626130.

The previous prime is 441626113. The next prime is 441626149. The reversal of 441626131 is 131626144.

Together with previous prime (441626113) it forms an Ormiston pair, because they use the same digits, order apart.

It is a balanced prime because it is at equal distance from previous prime (441626113) and next prime (441626149).

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 441626131 - 217 = 441495059 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×4416261312 = 390067279164058322, which contains 22 as substring.

It is equal to p23432419 and since 441626131 and 23432419 have the same sum of digits, it is a Honaker prime.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 441626131.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (441626111) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 220813065 + 220813066.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (220813066).

Almost surely, 2441626131 is an apocalyptic number.

441626131 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

441626131 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

441626131 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its digits is 3456, while the sum is 28.

The square root of 441626131 is about 21014.9025931599. The cubic root of 441626131 is about 761.5263249087.

The spelling of 441626131 in words is "four hundred forty-one million, six hundred twenty-six thousand, one hundred thirty-one".