Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1101010011101110001… |
… | …11111011110100111110 |
3 | 1121201021120221222011210 |
4 | 12221313013323310332 |
5 | 24442434331232032 |
6 | 550021550025250 |
7 | 45015312144402 |
oct | 6516707736476 |
9 | 1551246858153 |
10 | 457265102142 |
11 | 166a1a2581a2 |
12 | 747551a8226 |
13 | 341735b3674 |
14 | 181bb73b102 |
15 | bd63ec12cc |
hex | 6a771fbd3e |
457265102142 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 914530204296. Its totient is φ = 152421700712.
The previous prime is 457265102113. The next prime is 457265102143. The reversal of 457265102142 is 241201562754.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
457265102142 is an admirable number.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 457265102142.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (457265102143) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 38105425173 + ... + 38105425184.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (114316275537).
Almost surely, 2457265102142 is an apocalyptic number.
457265102142 is a primitive abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors, none of which is abundant.
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
457265102142 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
457265102142 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 76210850362.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 134400, while the sum is 39.
Adding to 457265102142 its reverse (241201562754), we get a palindrome (698466664896).
The spelling of 457265102142 in words is "four hundred fifty-seven billion, two hundred sixty-five million, one hundred two thousand, one hundred forty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.287 sec. • engine limits •