Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100011000001000100000… |
… | …0011011010000001100100 |
3 | 122001002021120110001221002 |
4 | 1012002020003122001210 |
5 | 1112322244331402144 |
6 | 14122522105212432 |
7 | 1004462565514346 |
oct | 106021003320144 |
9 | 18032246401832 |
10 | 4812645965924 |
11 | 1596039200775 |
12 | 658881491118 |
13 | 28baa49aa684 |
14 | 128d0cdd3296 |
15 | 852c45ba14e |
hex | 460880da064 |
4812645965924 has 12 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 8422486525824. Its totient is φ = 2406221244264.
The previous prime is 4812645965923. The next prime is 4812645965969. The reversal of 4812645965924 is 4295695462184.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×48126459659242 (a number of 26 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a hoax number, since the sum of its digits (65) coincides with the sum of the digits of its distinct prime factors.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (4812645965923) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 25328192 + ... + 25517495.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (701873877152).
Almost surely, 24812645965924 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
4812645965924 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (3609840559900).
4812645965924 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
4812645965924 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 50869354 (or 50869352 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 149299200, while the sum is 65.
The spelling of 4812645965924 in words is "four trillion, eight hundred twelve billion, six hundred forty-five million, nine hundred sixty-five thousand, nine hundred twenty-four".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •