Search a number
-
+
486008876302349 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin110111010000001011100001…
…0011011100000000000001101
32100201210222212012222120101212
41232200113002123200000031
51002200232134313133344
64441353221232344205
7204240661010643521
oct15640270233400015
92321728765876355
10486008876302349
111309482304a1554
12466139393a5065
1317b255956a006a
148802d52c03d81
153b2c315de579e
hex1ba05c26e000d

486008876302349 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 486008876302350. Its totient is φ = 486008876302348.

The previous prime is 486008876302297. The next prime is 486008876302459. The reversal of 486008876302349 is 943203678800684.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 407381463118249 + 78627413184100 = 20183693^2 + 8867210^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 486008876302349 - 28 = 486008876302093 is a prime.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (486008876302949) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 243004438151174 + 243004438151175.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (243004438151175).

Almost surely, 2486008876302349 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

486008876302349 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

486008876302349 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

486008876302349 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 334430208, while the sum is 68.

The spelling of 486008876302349 in words is "four hundred eighty-six trillion, eight billion, eight hundred seventy-six million, three hundred two thousand, three hundred forty-nine".