Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001100001001110… |
… | …01110001111010010 |
3 | 111012011102010100010 |
4 | 10300213032033102 |
5 | 40431300234402 |
6 | 2203040535350 |
7 | 240434002005 |
oct | 46047161722 |
9 | 14164363303 |
10 | 5110555602 |
11 | 2192859079 |
12 | ba7621556 |
13 | 635a29ac9 |
14 | 366a3d53c |
15 | 1ed9e3a6c |
hex | 1309ce3d2 |
5110555602 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 10221111216. Its totient is φ = 1703518532.
The previous prime is 5110555601. The next prime is 5110555607. The reversal of 5110555602 is 2065550115.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
5110555602 is an admirable number.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×51105556022 = 52235557122267164808, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 5110555602.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (5110555601) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 425879628 + ... + 425879639.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1277638902).
Almost surely, 25110555602 is an apocalyptic number.
5110555602 is a primitive abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors, none of which is abundant.
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
5110555602 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5110555602 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 851759272.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 7500, while the sum is 30.
The square root of 5110555602 is about 71488.1500809750. The cubic root of 5110555602 is about 1722.4873425216.
The spelling of 5110555602 in words is "five billion, one hundred ten million, five hundred fifty-five thousand, six hundred two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.074 sec. • engine limits •