Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110001001001100101… |
… | …011111011110110000 |
3 | 12001012220220201222220 |
4 | 301021211133132300 |
5 | 1331040142010332 |
6 | 40124421401040 |
7 | 3545536031331 |
oct | 611145373660 |
9 | 161186821886 |
10 | 52774172592 |
11 | 2042170aa79 |
12 | a289b69180 |
13 | 4c9072627b |
14 | 27a8d50288 |
15 | 158d1cbd2c |
hex | c4995f7b0 |
52774172592 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 139444884480. Its totient is φ = 17191028736.
The previous prime is 52774172573. The next prime is 52774172603. The reversal of 52774172592 is 29527147725.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×527741725922 (a number of 22 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1500909 + ... + 1535667.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1743061056).
Almost surely, 252774172592 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 52774172592, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (69722442240).
52774172592 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (86670711888).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
52774172592 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
52774172592 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 35490 (or 35484 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 2469600, while the sum is 51.
The spelling of 52774172592 in words is "fifty-two billion, seven hundred seventy-four million, one hundred seventy-two thousand, five hundred ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.113 sec. • engine limits •