Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10111000111110001110001 |
3 | 102101221100202 |
4 | 113013301301 |
5 | 3022424134 |
6 | 333524545 |
7 | 102343022 |
oct | 27076161 |
9 | 12357322 |
10 | 6061169 |
11 | 346a934 |
12 | 2043755 |
13 | 1342aba |
14 | b3ac49 |
15 | 7ead7e |
hex | 5c7c71 |
6061169 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 6061170. Its totient is φ = 6061168.
The previous prime is 6061157. The next prime is 6061183. The reversal of 6061169 is 9611606.
6061169 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a weak prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 5085025 + 976144 = 2255^2 + 988^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-6061169 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×60611692 = 73475539293122, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a Sophie Germain prime.
It is an Ulam number.
It is a Curzon number.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (6061189) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 3030584 + 3030585.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3030585).
Almost surely, 26061169 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
6061169 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
6061169 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
6061169 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1944, while the sum is 29.
The square root of 6061169 is about 2461.9441504632. The cubic root of 6061169 is about 182.3274806774.
The spelling of 6061169 in words is "six million, sixty-one thousand, one hundred sixty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.085 sec. • engine limits •