Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100011000110100… |
… | …00101100011110100 |
3 | 122011111022022010001 |
4 | 12030122011203310 |
5 | 102110024203202 |
6 | 3015533441044 |
7 | 323544206113 |
oct | 61432054364 |
9 | 18144268101 |
10 | 6650616052 |
11 | 2903110303 |
12 | 1357340184 |
13 | 81cb07292 |
14 | 4713adc7a |
15 | 28dd02d87 |
hex | 18c6858f4 |
6650616052 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 12048611400. Its totient is φ = 3208321536.
The previous prime is 6650616041. The next prime is 6650616059. The reversal of 6650616052 is 2506160566.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 4 ways, for example, as 4477751056 + 2172864996 = 66916^2 + 46614^2 .
It is a super-2 number, since 2×66506160522 = 88461387742240133408, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a hoax number, since the sum of its digits (37) coincides with the sum of the digits of its distinct prime factors.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (6650616059) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 146224 + ... + 186232.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (502025475).
Almost surely, 26650616052 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
6650616052 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (5397995348).
6650616052 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
6650616052 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 41475 (or 41473 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 64800, while the sum is 37.
The square root of 6650616052 is about 81551.3093211875. The cubic root of 6650616052 is about 1880.5604233104.
The spelling of 6650616052 in words is "six billion, six hundred fifty million, six hundred sixteen thousand, fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •