Search a number
-
+
673618603388149 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1001100100101001110000110…
…1100100011010110011110101
310021100002022100200012022102001
42121022130031210122303311
51201243031344431410044
610344400040405015301
7261613223645230456
oct23112341544326365
93240068320168361
10673618603388149
111856aa055459191
126367396b3b4531
1322bb3c66c150b3
14bc4b45888712d
1552d25745ba2d4
hex264a70d91acf5

673618603388149 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 673618603388150. Its totient is φ = 673618603388148.

The previous prime is 673618603388119. The next prime is 673618603388167. The reversal of 673618603388149 is 941883306816376.

673618603388149 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 579474760687524 + 94143842700625 = 24072282^2 + 9702775^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 673618603388149 - 25 = 673618603388117 is a prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (673618603388119) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 336809301694074 + 336809301694075.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (336809301694075).

Almost surely, 2673618603388149 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

673618603388149 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

673618603388149 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

673618603388149 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 752467968, while the sum is 73.

The spelling of 673618603388149 in words is "six hundred seventy-three trillion, six hundred eighteen billion, six hundred three million, three hundred eighty-eight thousand, one hundred forty-nine".