Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10100110100011110001 |
3 | 1021122211121 |
4 | 2212203301 |
5 | 133312400 |
6 | 22342241 |
7 | 5540665 |
oct | 2464361 |
9 | 1248747 |
10 | 682225 |
11 | 426625 |
12 | 28a981 |
13 | 1ab6ab |
14 | 13a8a5 |
15 | d721a |
hex | a68f1 |
682225 has 12 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 876060. Its totient is φ = 526400.
The previous prime is 682219. The next prime is 682229. The reversal of 682225 is 522286.
682225 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 6 ways, for example, as 3249 + 678976 = 57^2 + 824^2 .
It is not a de Polignac number, because 682225 - 211 = 680177 is a prime.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (25).
It is an Ulam number.
It is a d-powerful number, because it can be written as 67 + 86 + 28 + 213 + 217 + 54 .
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 682225.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (682229) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 255 + ... + 1195.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (73005).
2682225 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
682225 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (193835).
682225 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
682225 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 980 (or 975 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 1920, while the sum is 25.
The square root of 682225 is about 825.9691277524. The cubic root of 682225 is about 88.0324002593.
The spelling of 682225 in words is "six hundred eighty-two thousand, two hundred twenty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.093 sec. • engine limits •