Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101011100011011… |
… | …100000011010101 |
3 | 1212220221220222211 |
4 | 223203130003111 |
5 | 2444030211404 |
6 | 200301353421 |
7 | 24051635344 |
oct | 5343340325 |
9 | 1786856884 |
10 | 730710229 |
11 | 345515457 |
12 | 184868871 |
13 | b8502722 |
14 | 6d08db5b |
15 | 4423bb04 |
hex | 2b8dc0d5 |
730710229 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 730710230. Its totient is φ = 730710228.
The previous prime is 730710209. The next prime is 730710247. The reversal of 730710229 is 922017037.
730710229 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a strong prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 506160004 + 224550225 = 22498^2 + 14985^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 730710229 - 215 = 730677461 is a prime.
It is a Chen prime.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 730710229.
It is a congruent number.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (730710209) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 365355114 + 365355115.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (365355115).
Almost surely, 2730710229 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
730710229 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
730710229 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
730710229 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 5292, while the sum is 31.
The square root of 730710229 is about 27031.6523542310. The cubic root of 730710229 is about 900.7032482902.
The spelling of 730710229 in words is "seven hundred thirty million, seven hundred ten thousand, two hundred twenty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.070 sec. • engine limits •