Search a number
-
+
869205173741 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11001010011000001010…
…10100110010111101101
310002002120101212211012122
430221200222212113231
5103220113011024431
61503150215242325
7116540500033652
oct14514052462755
93062511784178
10869205173741
1130569a72a063
1212055b0793a5
1363c72833018
14300d959bc29
1517923c4da7b
hexca60aa65ed

869205173741 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 869205173742. Its totient is φ = 869205173740.

The previous prime is 869205173689. The next prime is 869205173801. The reversal of 869205173741 is 147371502968.

869205173741 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 750338820841 + 118866352900 = 866221^2 + 344770^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-869205173741 is a prime.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (869205773741) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 434602586870 + 434602586871.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (434602586871).

It is a 1-persistent number, because it is pandigital, but 2⋅869205173741 = 1738410347482 is not.

Almost surely, 2869205173741 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

869205173741 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

869205173741 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

869205173741 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2540160, while the sum is 53.

The spelling of 869205173741 in words is "eight hundred sixty-nine billion, two hundred five million, one hundred seventy-three thousand, seven hundred forty-one".