Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10000111011101110… |
… | …00110101110000001 |
3 | 212110120011112211201 |
4 | 20131313012232001 |
5 | 122104233404142 |
6 | 4102025541201 |
7 | 441165352615 |
oct | 103567065601 |
9 | 25416145751 |
10 | 9090919297 |
11 | 3945650249 |
12 | 1918644801 |
13 | b1b5647b5 |
14 | 623521345 |
15 | 38318aab7 |
hex | 21ddc6b81 |
9090919297 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 9090919298. Its totient is φ = 9090919296.
The previous prime is 9090919273. The next prime is 9090919301. The reversal of 9090919297 is 7929190909.
9090919297 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a strong prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 8964491761 + 126427536 = 94681^2 + 11244^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 9090919297 - 27 = 9090919169 is a prime.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (9090919237) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 4545459648 + 4545459649.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (4545459649).
Almost surely, 29090919297 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
9090919297 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
9090919297 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
9090919297 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 826686, while the sum is 55.
The square root of 9090919297 is about 95346.3124457365. The cubic root of 9090919297 is about 2087.0648034510.
The spelling of 9090919297 in words is "nine billion, ninety million, nine hundred nineteen thousand, two hundred ninety-seven".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.108 sec. • engine limits •