Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100011001011… |
… | …011011000100 |
3 | 122100111222012 |
4 | 203023123010 |
5 | 4330044303 |
6 | 525353352 |
7 | 141245540 |
oct | 43133304 |
9 | 18314865 |
10 | 9221828 |
11 | 5229550 |
12 | 3108858 |
13 | 1bab605 |
14 | 1320a20 |
15 | c225d8 |
hex | 8cb6c4 |
9221828 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 20428800. Its totient is φ = 3538080.
The previous prime is 9221819. The next prime is 9221831. The reversal of 9221828 is 8281229.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×92218282 = 170084223323168, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 9221794 and 9221803.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 24143 + ... + 24521.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (425600).
Almost surely, 29221828 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 9221828, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (10214400).
9221828 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (11206972).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
9221828 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
9221828 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 480 (or 478 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 4608, while the sum is 32.
The square root of 9221828 is about 3036.7462850887. The cubic root of 9221828 is about 209.7034969024.
The spelling of 9221828 in words is "nine million, two hundred twenty-one thousand, eight hundred twenty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.080 sec. • engine limits •