Search a number
-
+
94874256629 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin101100001011011110…
…0100100010011110101
3100001212221122121012122
41120112330210103311
53023300302203004
6111330140325325
76566033606165
oct1302674442365
9301787577178
1094874256629
1137266054259
1216479243845
138c3c8c59b9
1448403ca5a5
152704245cbe
hex1616f244f5

94874256629 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 94874256630. Its totient is φ = 94874256628.

The previous prime is 94874256577. The next prime is 94874256641. The reversal of 94874256629 is 92665247849.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 50764596100 + 44109660529 = 225310^2 + 210023^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (92665247849) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-94874256629 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×948742566292 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (94874256649) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 47437128314 + 47437128315.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (47437128315).

Almost surely, 294874256629 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

94874256629 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

94874256629 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

94874256629 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 52254720, while the sum is 62.

The spelling of 94874256629 in words is "ninety-four billion, eight hundred seventy-four million, two hundred fifty-six thousand, six hundred twenty-nine".