Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011010111111… |
… | …11111010000010 |
3 | 20122112211200100 |
4 | 11223333322002 |
5 | 143411420114 |
6 | 13245103230 |
7 | 2236025343 |
oct | 553777202 |
9 | 218484610 |
10 | 95420034 |
11 | 49953536 |
12 | 27b57b16 |
13 | 169cbc78 |
14 | c95c0ca |
15 | 859c909 |
hex | 5affe82 |
95420034 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 217971000. Its totient is φ = 30121728.
The previous prime is 95420029. The next prime is 95420041. The reversal of 95420034 is 43002459.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 4 ways, for example, as 62964225 + 32455809 = 7935^2 + 5697^2 .
It is a super-3 number, since 3×954200343 (a number of 25 digits) contains 333 as substring. Note that it is a super-d number also for d = 2.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 25942 + ... + 29390.
Almost surely, 295420034 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 95420034, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (108985500).
95420034 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (122550966).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
95420034 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
95420034 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 3539 (or 3536 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 4320, while the sum is 27.
The square root of 95420034 is about 9768.3178695208. The cubic root of 95420034 is about 456.9617570508.
The spelling of 95420034 in words is "ninety-five million, four hundred twenty thousand, thirty-four".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.091 sec. • engine limits •