Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10001111101010011… |
… | …11000011100100001 |
3 | 220212220102200101010 |
4 | 20332221320130201 |
5 | 124221110213324 |
6 | 4232402131133 |
7 | 460626002304 |
oct | 107651703441 |
9 | 26786380333 |
10 | 9641101089 |
11 | 40a8171a44 |
12 | 1a50950aa9 |
13 | ba8539959 |
14 | 67661ab3b |
15 | 3b6617829 |
hex | 23ea78721 |
9641101089 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 12855256000. Its totient is φ = 6427173456.
The previous prime is 9641101039. The next prime is 9641101103. The reversal of 9641101089 is 9801011469.
9641101089 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 9641101089 - 216 = 9641035553 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (9641101039) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 128679 + ... + 189315.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1606907000).
Almost surely, 29641101089 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
9641101089 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (3214154911).
9641101089 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
9641101089 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 113639.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 15552, while the sum is 39.
The square root of 9641101089 is about 98189.1088104989. The cubic root of 9641101089 is about 2128.3459050816.
The spelling of 9641101089 in words is "nine billion, six hundred forty-one million, one hundred one thousand, eighty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •