Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001000101001101001010… |
… | …0100111111100001101101 |
3 | 1022100120010101112110021222 |
4 | 2101103102210333201231 |
5 | 2302043323422034103 |
6 | 33123021310033125 |
7 | 2050252344226262 |
oct | 221232244774155 |
9 | 38316111473258 |
10 | 9985036908653 |
11 | 31aa6a3031024 |
12 | 11532007a87a5 |
13 | 57577b162c11 |
14 | 2673c7b95269 |
15 | 124b014be638 |
hex | 914d293f86d |
9985036908653 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 9995360284416. Its totient is φ = 9974718853200.
The previous prime is 9985036908643. The next prime is 9985036908659. The reversal of 9985036908653 is 3568096305899.
9985036908653 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
It is a cyclic number.
It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-9985036908653 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (9985036908659) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2430908 + ... + 5087178.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1249420035552).
Almost surely, 29985036908653 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
9985036908653 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (10323375763).
9985036908653 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
9985036908653 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 2660155.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 377913600, while the sum is 71.
The spelling of 9985036908653 in words is "nine trillion, nine hundred eighty-five billion, thirty-six million, nine hundred eight thousand, six hundred fifty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •