Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001001100011111000110… |
… | …0001011001000100110010 |
3 | 1022210111221221211101201200 |
4 | 2103013301201121010302 |
5 | 2311121001142010002 |
6 | 33300304230512030 |
7 | 2062300645005210 |
oct | 223076141310462 |
9 | 38714857741650 |
10 | 10110110110002 |
11 | 3248745650431 |
12 | 11734a7505616 |
13 | 5844c13c8876 |
14 | 26d490bb5cb0 |
15 | 127ec1a3ab1c |
hex | 931f1859132 |
10110110110002 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 25034558367936. Its totient is φ = 2888602888536.
The previous prime is 10110110109991. The next prime is 10110110110003. The reversal of 10110110110002 is 20001101101101.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (9).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (10110110110003) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 40119484438 + ... + 40119484689.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1043106598664).
Almost surely, 210110110110002 is an apocalyptic number.
10110110110002 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (14924448257934).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
10110110110002 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10110110110002 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 80238969142 (or 80238969139 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2, while the sum is 9.
Adding to 10110110110002 its reverse (20001101101101), we get a palindrome (30111211211103).
The spelling of 10110110110002 in words is "ten trillion, one hundred ten billion, one hundred ten million, one hundred ten thousand, two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •