Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001010011101001100010… |
… | …0111001101111011001000 |
3 | 1100020021121101110101020221 |
4 | 2110322120213031323020 |
5 | 2320130014131012202 |
6 | 33433015441155424 |
7 | 2104215361132456 |
oct | 224723047157310 |
9 | 40207541411227 |
10 | 10233172516552 |
11 | 329595611a957 |
12 | 119331092bb74 |
13 | 592ca3ba78cb |
14 | 275406b2b9d6 |
15 | 12b2c57b1037 |
hex | 94e989cdec8 |
10233172516552 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 19187725139100. Its totient is φ = 5116445812800.
The previous prime is 10233172516481. The next prime is 10233172516597. The reversal of 10233172516552 is 25561527133201.
It is a happy number.
10233172516552 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 2 ways, for example, as 9512992850596 + 720179665956 = 3084314^2 + 848634^2 .
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 10233172516499 and 10233172516508.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 17245699 + ... + 17829202.
Almost surely, 210233172516552 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
10233172516552 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (8954552622548).
10233172516552 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10233172516552 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 35111376 (or 35111372 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 378000, while the sum is 43.
Adding to 10233172516552 its reverse (25561527133201), we get a palindrome (35794699649753).
The spelling of 10233172516552 in words is "ten trillion, two hundred thirty-three billion, one hundred seventy-two million, five hundred sixteen thousand, five hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •