Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110011010101001011… |
… | …0100101100101010101 |
3 | 101112112021101111100200 |
4 | 1212222112211211111 |
5 | 3301223422331404 |
6 | 122350123131113 |
7 | 10651441332342 |
oct | 1465226454525 |
9 | 345467344320 |
10 | 110232230229 |
11 | 42827247120 |
12 | 19444673a99 |
13 | a51965a344 |
14 | 5499d957c9 |
15 | 2d026bb839 |
hex | 19aa5a5955 |
110232230229 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 183916878912. Its totient is φ = 62877563520.
The previous prime is 110232230219. The next prime is 110232230257. The reversal of 110232230229 is 922032232011.
110232230229 is a `hidden beast` number, since 1 + 10 + 2 + 322 + 302 + 29 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 110232230229 - 29 = 110232229717 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×1102322302292 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (110232230209) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 32747049 + ... + 32750414.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (7663203288).
Almost surely, 2110232230229 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
110232230229 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (73684648683).
110232230229 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
110232230229 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 65497497 (or 65497494 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2592, while the sum is 27.
The spelling of 110232230229 in words is "one hundred ten billion, two hundred thirty-two million, two hundred thirty thousand, two hundred twenty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.066 sec. • engine limits •