Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10100101101100110… |
… | …11011110011001010 |
3 | 1001200222020112120100 |
4 | 22112303123303022 |
5 | 140233210001302 |
6 | 5035232110230 |
7 | 542364304443 |
oct | 122663336312 |
9 | 31628215510 |
10 | 11120000202 |
11 | 4796a4a813 |
12 | 21a4095376 |
13 | 1082a5169c |
14 | 776bca2ca |
15 | 451394d1c |
hex | 296cdbcca |
11120000202 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 24869145600. Its totient is φ = 3588320736.
The previous prime is 11120000183. The next prime is 11120000257. The reversal of 11120000202 is 20200002111.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (9).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 90583 + ... + 174485.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (518107200).
Almost surely, 211120000202 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 11120000202, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (12434572800).
11120000202 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (13749145398).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
11120000202 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
11120000202 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 84147 (or 84144 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 8, while the sum is 9.
Adding to 11120000202 its reverse (20200002111), we get a palindrome (31320002313).
The spelling of 11120000202 in words is "eleven billion, one hundred twenty million, two hundred two", and thus it is an aban number.
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •