Search a number
-
+
1201122122129 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10001011110101000011…
…101010001100110010001
311020211022021011211011022
4101132220131101212101
5124134344230402004
62315442103325225
7152530632404066
oct21365035214621
94224267154138
101201122122129
11423436141056
12174951450815
138935ac129b7
14421c5584c6d
152139d4912be
hex117a8751991

1201122122129 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 1201122122130. Its totient is φ = 1201122122128.

The previous prime is 1201122122099. The next prime is 1201122122141. The reversal of 1201122122129 is 9212212211021.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 1194091635025 + 7030487104 = 1092745^2 + 83848^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (9212212211021) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-1201122122129 is a prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 1201122122098 and 1201122122107.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (1201122122329) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 600561061064 + 600561061065.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (600561061065).

Almost surely, 21201122122129 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

1201122122129 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

1201122122129 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

1201122122129 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 576, while the sum is 26.

The spelling of 1201122122129 in words is "one trillion, two hundred one billion, one hundred twenty-two million, one hundred twenty-two thousand, one hundred twenty-nine".