Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111101100100100011… |
… | …1011110101111001011 |
3 | 110122021212021111222002 |
4 | 1323021013132233023 |
5 | 4131243114401303 |
6 | 140424214021215 |
7 | 12360420441413 |
oct | 1731107365713 |
9 | 418255244862 |
10 | 132223200203 |
11 | 51091605376 |
12 | 2176134780b |
13 | c61266a103 |
14 | 6584865643 |
15 | 368d114788 |
hex | 1ec91debcb |
132223200203 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 132223200204. Its totient is φ = 132223200202.
The previous prime is 132223200199. The next prime is 132223200229. The reversal of 132223200203 is 302002322231.
It is a weak prime.
It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (302002322231) is a distict prime.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 132223200203 - 22 = 132223200199 is a prime.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (132223200233) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 66111600101 + 66111600102.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (66111600102).
Almost surely, 2132223200203 is an apocalyptic number.
132223200203 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
132223200203 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
132223200203 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 864, while the sum is 20.
Adding to 132223200203 its reverse (302002322231), we get a palindrome (434225522434).
The spelling of 132223200203 in words is "one hundred thirty-two billion, two hundred twenty-three million, two hundred thousand, two hundred three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •