Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10011010110110110010… |
… | …010100011100101100011 |
3 | 11201011111011000121020111 |
4 | 103112312102203211203 |
5 | 133243224010242011 |
6 | 2455030435152151 |
7 | 165050450513413 |
oct | 23266622434543 |
9 | 4634434017214 |
10 | 1330203212131 |
11 | 473155042532 |
12 | 195976445657 |
13 | 9858c5cc8b1 |
14 | 4854c9b0643 |
15 | 249057e0121 |
hex | 135b64a3963 |
1330203212131 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 1330203212132. Its totient is φ = 1330203212130.
The previous prime is 1330203212111. The next prime is 1330203212161. The reversal of 1330203212131 is 1312123020331.
It is a weak prime.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 1330203212131 - 25 = 1330203212099 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×13302032121312 (a number of 25 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (1330203212111) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 665101606065 + 665101606066.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (665101606066).
Almost surely, 21330203212131 is an apocalyptic number.
1330203212131 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
1330203212131 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
1330203212131 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 648, while the sum is 22.
Adding to 1330203212131 its reverse (1312123020331), we get a palindrome (2642326232462).
The spelling of 1330203212131 in words is "one trillion, three hundred thirty billion, two hundred three million, two hundred twelve thousand, one hundred thirty-one".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.115 sec. • engine limits •