Search a number
-
+
140223421023409 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11111111000100001001111…
…001100110000010010110001
3200101111020011022022111020001
4133320201033030300102301
5121334410031240222114
61214121430022550001
741351544043455133
oct3770411714602261
9611436138274201
10140223421023409
1140752467606a39
12138882a3b98301
1360320200b14b9
14268abc7b75053
1511327edbd8374
hex7f884f3304b1

140223421023409 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 140223421023410. Its totient is φ = 140223421023408.

The previous prime is 140223421023373. The next prime is 140223421023421. The reversal of 140223421023409 is 904320124322041.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 139129102090000 + 1094318933409 = 11795300^2 + 1046097^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 140223421023409 - 27 = 140223421023281 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×1402234210234092 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (140223421023479) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 70111710511704 + 70111710511705.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (70111710511705).

Almost surely, 2140223421023409 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

140223421023409 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

140223421023409 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

140223421023409 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 82944, while the sum is 37.

The spelling of 140223421023409 in words is "one hundred forty trillion, two hundred twenty-three billion, four hundred twenty-one million, twenty-three thousand, four hundred nine".