Search a number
-
+
200332100223881 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin101101100011001101110011…
…101010111100001110001001
3222021022120011111210102020022
4231203031303222330032021
5202224220120124131011
61550023144001510225
760124342124534543
oct5543156352741611
9867276144712208
10200332100223881
1158917403a2499a
121a575853042375
1387a230b61b5b2
1437681a80b8693
15182616e9358db
hexb63373abc389

200332100223881 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 200332100223882. Its totient is φ = 200332100223880.

The previous prime is 200332100223877. The next prime is 200332100223919. The reversal of 200332100223881 is 188322001233002.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 189617967393856 + 10714132830025 = 13770184^2 + 3273245^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 200332100223881 - 22 = 200332100223877 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×2003321002238812 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (200332100223821) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 100166050111940 + 100166050111941.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (100166050111941).

Almost surely, 2200332100223881 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

200332100223881 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

200332100223881 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

200332100223881 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 27648, while the sum is 35.

Adding to 200332100223881 its reverse (188322001233002), we get a palindrome (388654101456883).

The spelling of 200332100223881 in words is "two hundred trillion, three hundred thirty-two billion, one hundred million, two hundred twenty-three thousand, eight hundred eighty-one".