Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011101101100010100… |
… | …0100100100111100110 |
3 | 201020100011221221000011 |
4 | 2323120220210213212 |
5 | 11244030432310042 |
6 | 232233102440434 |
7 | 20351666236600 |
oct | 2733050444746 |
9 | 636304857004 |
10 | 201203010022 |
11 | 78369943463 |
12 | 32bb259311a |
13 | 15c86628721 |
14 | 9a49b96170 |
15 | 5378da6a17 |
hex | 2ed8a249e6 |
201203010022 has 12 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 351078721740. Its totient is φ = 86229861396.
The previous prime is 201203010017. The next prime is 201203010023. The reversal of 201203010022 is 220010302102.
201203010022 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 201203009984 and 201203010011.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (201203010023) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 5 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1026545872 + ... + 1026546067.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (29256560145).
Almost surely, 2201203010022 is an apocalyptic number.
201203010022 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (149875711718).
201203010022 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
201203010022 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 2053091955 (or 2053091948 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 48, while the sum is 13.
Adding to 201203010022 its reverse (220010302102), we get a palindrome (421213312124).
The spelling of 201203010022 in words is "two hundred one billion, two hundred three million, ten thousand, twenty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.065 sec. • engine limits •