Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100011010110110000… |
… | …0011000111011000010 |
3 | 202101201201122211111000 |
4 | 3012231200120323002 |
5 | 11443432233042222 |
6 | 242003534232430 |
7 | 21262240010343 |
oct | 3065540307302 |
9 | 671651584430 |
10 | 213364346562 |
11 | 8253a67a614 |
12 | 35427355716 |
13 | 1717402b153 |
14 | a480db00ca |
15 | 583b8959ac |
hex | 31ad818ec2 |
213364346562 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 481421721600. Its totient is φ = 70030532880.
The previous prime is 213364346551. The next prime is 213364346593. The reversal of 213364346562 is 265643463312.
213364346562 is a `hidden beast` number, since 2 + 1 + 3 + 3 + 6 + 43 + 46 + 562 = 666.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 9652639 + ... + 9674717.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (7522214400).
Almost surely, 2213364346562 is an apocalyptic number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 213364346562, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (240710860800).
213364346562 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (268057375038).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
213364346562 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
213364346562 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 24828 (or 24822 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 1866240, while the sum is 45.
The spelling of 213364346562 in words is "two hundred thirteen billion, three hundred sixty-four million, three hundred forty-six thousand, five hundred sixty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.078 sec. • engine limits •