Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1111011000000000100… |
… | …1111110000010110111 |
3 | 221020210120211212220212 |
4 | 3312000021332002313 |
5 | 13311431113232020 |
6 | 321202355220035 |
7 | 25040466215453 |
oct | 3660011760267 |
9 | 836716755825 |
10 | 264143102135 |
11 | a2027993210 |
12 | 43238ba761b |
13 | 1bba7223093 |
14 | cadacd9663 |
15 | 6d0e7b7cc5 |
hex | 3d8027e0b7 |
264143102135 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 345787333776. Its totient is φ = 192104074240.
The previous prime is 264143102081. The next prime is 264143102143. The reversal of 264143102135 is 531201341462.
264143102135 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 264143102135 - 220 = 264142053559 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2401300874 + ... + 2401300983.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (43223416722).
Almost surely, 2264143102135 is an apocalyptic number.
264143102135 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (81644231641).
264143102135 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
264143102135 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 4802601873.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 17280, while the sum is 32.
Adding to 264143102135 its reverse (531201341462), we get a palindrome (795344443597).
The spelling of 264143102135 in words is "two hundred sixty-four billion, one hundred forty-three million, one hundred two thousand, one hundred thirty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •