Search a number
-
+
303133403081 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1000110100101000010…
…10001010011111001001
31001222102212222101201002
410122110022022133021
514431304122344311
6351131344504345
730620633261315
oct4322412123711
91058385871632
10303133403081
111076159a3423
124a8ba91b0b5
132277c050882
1410959352b45
157d4280493b
hex469428a7c9

303133403081 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 303133403082. Its totient is φ = 303133403080.

The previous prime is 303133403059. The next prime is 303133403137. The reversal of 303133403081 is 180304331303.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 258140205625 + 44993197456 = 508075^2 + 212116^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-303133403081 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×3031334030812 (a number of 24 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (303133403021) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 151566701540 + 151566701541.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (151566701541).

Almost surely, 2303133403081 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

303133403081 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

303133403081 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

303133403081 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 7776, while the sum is 29.

Adding to 303133403081 its reverse (180304331303), we get a palindrome (483437734384).

The spelling of 303133403081 in words is "three hundred three billion, one hundred thirty-three million, four hundred three thousand, eighty-one".