Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011011111111000… |
… | …1011000100100001 |
3 | 21222002211220112112 |
4 | 2313332023010201 |
5 | 22310122410201 |
6 | 1230135005105 |
7 | 136326030146 |
oct | 26776130441 |
9 | 7862756475 |
10 | 3086528801 |
11 | 13442a0854 |
12 | 721809795 |
13 | 3a25bc505 |
14 | 213ccc3cd |
15 | 130e870bb |
hex | b7f8b121 |
3086528801 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3086528802. Its totient is φ = 3086528800.
The previous prime is 3086528779. The next prime is 3086528833. The reversal of 3086528801 is 1088256803.
It is a weak prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 2211256576 + 875272225 = 47024^2 + 29585^2 .
It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (1088256803) is a distict prime.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 3086528801 - 210 = 3086527777 is a prime.
It is a Sophie Germain prime.
It is a Curzon number.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3086528881) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1543264400 + 1543264401.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1543264401).
Almost surely, 23086528801 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
3086528801 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
3086528801 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
3086528801 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 92160, while the sum is 41.
The square root of 3086528801 is about 55556.5369781091. The cubic root of 3086528801 is about 1455.9845882081.
The spelling of 3086528801 in words is "three billion, eighty-six million, five hundred twenty-eight thousand, eight hundred one".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.084 sec. • engine limits •