Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001000101110011101… |
… | …00100010000000011111 |
3 | 1002212020120102021100012 |
4 | 10202321310202000133 |
5 | 20104200412413210 |
6 | 355254411553435 |
7 | 31365311254562 |
oct | 4427164420037 |
9 | 1085216367305 |
10 | 312355201055 |
11 | 110518405767 |
12 | 5065315b87b |
13 | 235bb74aa71 |
14 | 11191dc24d9 |
15 | 81d21e4305 |
hex | 48b9d2201f |
312355201055 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 375182707680. Its totient is φ = 249646645248.
The previous prime is 312355201031. The next prime is 312355201079. The reversal of 312355201055 is 550102553213.
It is an interprime number because it is at equal distance from previous prime (312355201031) and next prime (312355201079).
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 312355201055 - 230 = 311281459231 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×3123552010552 (a number of 24 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 27565631 + ... + 27576959.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (23448919230).
Almost surely, 2312355201055 is an apocalyptic number.
312355201055 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (62827506625).
312355201055 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
312355201055 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 16090.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 22500, while the sum is 32.
Adding to 312355201055 its reverse (550102553213), we get a palindrome (862457754268).
The spelling of 312355201055 in words is "three hundred twelve billion, three hundred fifty-five million, two hundred one thousand, fifty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.134 sec. • engine limits •