Search a number
-
+
35304343201331 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10000000011011111011101…
…10101011110011000110011
311122000001200101020101210222
420001233232311132120303
514111411243324420311
6203030331422443255
710302440351600411
oct1001575665363063
9148001611211728
1035304343201331
111028154039a2a6
123b6227513352b
131691254099319
148a0a4ca062b1
15413531123adb
hex201beed5e633

35304343201331 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 35304343201332. Its totient is φ = 35304343201330.

The previous prime is 35304343201327. The next prime is 35304343201343. The reversal of 35304343201331 is 13310234340353.

It is a weak prime.

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (13310234340353) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 35304343201331 - 22 = 35304343201327 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×353043432013312 (a number of 28 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 35304343201291 and 35304343201300.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (35304343201031) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 17652171600665 + 17652171600666.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (17652171600666).

Almost surely, 235304343201331 is an apocalyptic number.

35304343201331 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

35304343201331 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

35304343201331 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 116640, while the sum is 35.

Adding to 35304343201331 its reverse (13310234340353), we get a palindrome (48614577541684).

The spelling of 35304343201331 in words is "thirty-five trillion, three hundred four billion, three hundred forty-three million, two hundred one thousand, three hundred thirty-one".