Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100110101001010101… |
… | …010100000000000000 |
3 | 10222002220101000202210 |
4 | 212221111110000000 |
5 | 1134440341021422 |
6 | 31021323342120 |
7 | 2666205065301 |
oct | 465125240000 |
9 | 128086330683 |
10 | 41495642112 |
11 | 16664232101 |
12 | 8060981940 |
13 | 3bb3baa0b2 |
14 | 20190987a8 |
15 | 112ce7010c |
hex | 9a9554000 |
41495642112 has 240 divisors, whose sum is σ = 115601976000. Its totient is φ = 13227786240.
The previous prime is 41495642093. The next prime is 41495642197. The reversal of 41495642112 is 21124659414.
Its product of digits (69120) is a multiple of the sum of its prime factors (480).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 118898514 + ... + 118898862.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (481674900).
Almost surely, 241495642112 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 41495642112, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (57800988000).
41495642112 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (74106333888).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
41495642112 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
41495642112 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 480 (or 454 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 69120, while the sum is 39.
The spelling of 41495642112 in words is "forty-one billion, four hundred ninety-five million, six hundred forty-two thousand, one hundred twelve".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •