Search a number
-
+
4440234201041 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100000010011101001010…
…0101010000111111010001
3120201111000120000020212002
41000213102211100333101
51040222044423413131
613235452044443345
7635540066655602
oct100472245207721
916644016006762
104440234201041
1114621024a4791
125b8669549555
13262934b89812
14114ca0c35da9
157a779bed6cb
hex409d2950fd1

4440234201041 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 4440234201042. Its totient is φ = 4440234201040.

The previous prime is 4440234201001. The next prime is 4440234201059. The reversal of 4440234201041 is 1401024320444.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 4042830041041 + 397404160000 = 2010679^2 + 630400^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 4440234201041 - 226 = 4440167092177 is a prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 4440234200995 and 4440234201013.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (4440234201001) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 2220117100520 + 2220117100521.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2220117100521).

Almost surely, 24440234201041 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

4440234201041 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

4440234201041 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

4440234201041 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 12288, while the sum is 29.

Adding to 4440234201041 its reverse (1401024320444), we get a palindrome (5841258521485).

The spelling of 4440234201041 in words is "four trillion, four hundred forty billion, two hundred thirty-four million, two hundred one thousand, forty-one".