Search a number
-
+
4808404409 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1000111101001101…
…00110110110111001
3110102002212020211012
410132212212312321
534321422420114
62113044443305
7230104522514
oct43646466671
913362766735
104808404409
112048245446
12b223a9535
135b8257b13
14338869d7b
151d220c63e
hex11e9a6db9

4808404409 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 4808404410. Its totient is φ = 4808404408.

The previous prime is 4808404397. The next prime is 4808404427. The reversal of 4808404409 is 9044048084.

4808404409 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 2519738809 + 2288665600 = 50197^2 + 47840^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 4808404409 - 212 = 4808400313 is a prime.

It is a super-3 number, since 3×48084044093 (a number of 30 digits) contains 333 as substring.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (4808404709) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 2404202204 + 2404202205.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2404202205).

Almost surely, 24808404409 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

4808404409 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

4808404409 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

4808404409 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 147456, while the sum is 41.

The square root of 4808404409 is about 69342.6593735775. The cubic root of 4808404409 is about 1687.8492778178.

The spelling of 4808404409 in words is "four billion, eight hundred eight million, four hundred four thousand, four hundred nine".