4922235701 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 4922376192. Its totient is φ = 4922095212.

The previous prime is 4922235679. The next prime is 4922235713. The reversal of 4922235701 is 1075322294.

It is a happy number.

4922235701 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes, and also a Blum integer, because the two primes are equal to 3 mod 4, and also a brilliant number, because the two primes have the same length.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 4922235701 - 2¹⁴ = 4922219317 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×4922235701² = 48456808592397922802, which contains 22 as substring.

It is a Duffinian number.

It is a congruent number.

It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (4922235001) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 29900 + ... + 103626.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1230594048).

Almost surely, 2^4922235701 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

4922235701 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (140491).

4922235701 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

4922235701 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The sum of its prime factors is 140490.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 30240, while the sum is 35.

The square root of 4922235701 is about 70158.6466588403. The cubic root of 4922235701 is about 1701.0645812911.

Adding to 4922235701 its reverse (1075322294), we get a palindrome (5997557995).

The spelling of 4922235701 in words is "four billion, nine hundred twenty-two million, two hundred thirty-five thousand, seven hundred one".