Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001110011011101… |
… | …01010101100000101 |
3 | 111120211012121110200 |
4 | 10321232222230011 |
5 | 41234424031320 |
6 | 2230143041113 |
7 | 244302013062 |
oct | 47156525405 |
9 | 14524177420 |
10 | 5263502085 |
11 | 2261123026 |
12 | 102a8a0199 |
13 | 65b61ab9a |
14 | 37d093c69 |
15 | 20c156290 |
hex | 139baab05 |
5263502085 has 12 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 9123403692. Its totient is φ = 2807201088.
The previous prime is 5263502063. The next prime is 5263502093. The reversal of 5263502085 is 5802053625.
It is a happy number.
5263502085 is a `hidden beast` number, since 526 + 3 + 50 + 2 + 0 + 85 = 666.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 2 ways, for example, as 3706252641 + 1557249444 = 60879^2 + 39462^2 .
It is not a de Polignac number, because 5263502085 - 214 = 5263485701 is a prime.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 58483312 + ... + 58483401.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (760283641).
Almost surely, 25263502085 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
5263502085 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (3859901607).
5263502085 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5263502085 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 116966724 (or 116966721 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 72000, while the sum is 36.
The square root of 5263502085 is about 72549.9971399035. The cubic root of 5263502085 is about 1739.5020027477.
The spelling of 5263502085 in words is "five billion, two hundred sixty-three million, five hundred two thousand, eighty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •