Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100111001010011111101… |
… | …1110111111011000110111 |
3 | 201001120120202202000221200 |
4 | 1032110333132333120313 |
5 | 1201142141213013310 |
6 | 15240432013143543 |
7 | 1063612211350644 |
oct | 116247736773067 |
9 | 21046522660850 |
10 | 5382659110455 |
11 | 1795855818990 |
12 | 72b24178abb3 |
13 | 300775bc5a03 |
14 | 148744890dcb |
15 | 95036a589c0 |
hex | 4e53f7bf637 |
5382659110455 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 10211272815744. Its totient is φ = 2601273147840.
The previous prime is 5382659110441. The next prime is 5382659110463. The reversal of 5382659110455 is 5540119562835.
5382659110455 is a `hidden beast` number, since 5 + 3 + 8 + 2 + 6 + 591 + 1 + 0 + 45 + 5 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 5382659110455 - 210 = 5382659109431 is a prime.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (29) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 47 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 17558229 + ... + 17862158.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (212734850328).
Almost surely, 25382659110455 is an apocalyptic number.
5382659110455 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (55) formed by its first and last digit.
5382659110455 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (4828613705289).
5382659110455 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5382659110455 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 35420716 (or 35420713 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 6480000, while the sum is 54.
The spelling of 5382659110455 in words is "five trillion, three hundred eighty-two billion, six hundred fifty-nine million, one hundred ten thousand, four hundred fifty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.064 sec. • engine limits •