Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110010010000101010… |
… | …111110101000000000 |
3 | 12011022001001010221010 |
4 | 302100222332220000 |
5 | 1341010444340331 |
6 | 40443023400520 |
7 | 3620230113360 |
oct | 622052765000 |
9 | 164261033833 |
10 | 53966793216 |
11 | 20983936556 |
12 | a561453140 |
13 | 512083594b |
14 | 287d4bc9a0 |
15 | 160cc5ae46 |
hex | c90abea00 |
53966793216 has 320 divisors, whose sum is σ = 179991694080. Its totient is φ = 14010286080.
The previous prime is 53966793169. The next prime is 53966793217. The reversal of 53966793216 is 61239766935.
It is a happy number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (53966793217) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 5295646 + ... + 5305826.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (562474044).
Almost surely, 253966793216 is an apocalyptic number.
53966793216 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (56) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 53966793216, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (89995847040).
53966793216 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (126024900864).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
53966793216 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
53966793216 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 10255 (or 10239 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 11022480, while the sum is 57.
The spelling of 53966793216 in words is "fifty-three billion, nine hundred sixty-six million, seven hundred ninety-three thousand, two hundred sixteen".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.074 sec. • engine limits •