Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11001011101111011000001… |
… | …00111110101111111110001 |
3 | 21100021220100010012111101211 |
4 | 30232331200213311333301 |
5 | 24320031034101130230 |
6 | 315035424444200121 |
7 | 14540063612315635 |
oct | 1456754047657761 |
9 | 240256303174354 |
10 | 56003699630065 |
11 | 16932043478350 |
12 | 6345a85839041 |
13 | 25331843a7195 |
14 | db88448bcdc5 |
15 | 671bb87d942a |
hex | 32ef609f5ff1 |
56003699630065 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 74331480375936. Its totient is φ = 40167627356160.
The previous prime is 56003699630023. The next prime is 56003699630077.
56003699630065 is nontrivially palindromic in base 10.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 56003699630065 - 213 = 56003699621873 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 56003699629991 and 56003699630009.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (29) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 17036862 + ... + 20056471.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2322858761748).
Almost surely, 256003699630065 is an apocalyptic number.
56003699630065 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (55) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
56003699630065 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (18327780745871).
56003699630065 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
56003699630065 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 37093729.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 23619600, while the sum is 58.
The spelling of 56003699630065 in words is "fifty-six trillion, three billion, six hundred ninety-nine million, six hundred thirty thousand, sixty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.075 sec. • engine limits •