Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110100001100110110… |
… | …110111111011010100 |
3 | 12100200020111120010100 |
4 | 310030312313323110 |
5 | 1404242333130132 |
6 | 41425452054100 |
7 | 4022656400250 |
oct | 641466677324 |
9 | 170606446110 |
10 | 56050286292 |
11 | 21852a1a760 |
12 | aa43164330 |
13 | 53933942a0 |
14 | 29da0ad260 |
15 | 16d0b1237c |
hex | d0cdb7ed4 |
56050286292 has 576 divisors, whose sum is σ = 203239895040. Its totient is φ = 12541132800.
The previous prime is 56050286231. The next prime is 56050286309. The reversal of 56050286292 is 29268205065.
56050286292 is a `hidden beast` number, since 5 + 60 + 502 + 86 + 2 + 9 + 2 = 666.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 191 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 48611988 + ... + 48613140.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (352847040).
Almost surely, 256050286292 is an apocalyptic number.
56050286292 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (52) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 56050286292, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (101619947520).
56050286292 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (147189608748).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
56050286292 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
56050286292 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1284 (or 1279 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 518400, while the sum is 45.
The spelling of 56050286292 in words is "fifty-six billion, fifty million, two hundred eighty-six thousand, two hundred ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.066 sec. • engine limits •