Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011001010101010… |
… | …00101110100110011 |
3 | 120110210122022002200 |
4 | 11211111011310303 |
5 | 44234204314440 |
6 | 2430513314243 |
7 | 301363421343 |
oct | 54525056463 |
9 | 16423568080 |
10 | 5994994995 |
11 | 25a7022520 |
12 | 11b3865983 |
13 | 747035922 |
14 | 40c2a8d23 |
15 | 251499c30 |
hex | 165545d33 |
5994994995 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 11674091520. Its totient is φ = 2821029120.
The previous prime is 5994994991. The next prime is 5994995009.
5994994995 is a `hidden beast` number, since 5 + 9 + 9 + 499 + 49 + 95 = 666.
5994994995 is nontrivially palindromic in base 10.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 5994994995 - 22 = 5994994991 is a prime.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (5994994991) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 95 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2953641 + ... + 2955669.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (121605120).
Almost surely, 25994994995 is an apocalyptic number.
5994994995 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (55) formed by its first and last digit.
5994994995 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (5679096525).
5994994995 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5994994995 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 2225 (or 2222 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 212576400, while the sum is 72.
The square root of 5994994995 is about 77427.3530155849. The cubic root of 5994994995 is about 1816.6151912955.
The spelling of 5994994995 in words is "five billion, nine hundred ninety-four million, nine hundred ninety-four thousand, nine hundred ninety-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •