Search a number
-
+
7300143041 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1101100110001111…
…10101011111000001
3200211202111200122012
412303013311133001
5104422314034131
63204215222305
7345622122602
oct66307653701
920752450565
107300143041
113106816574
1214b8977995
138c4553b89
144d3769da9
152cad5552b
hex1b31f57c1

7300143041 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 7300143042. Its totient is φ = 7300143040.

The previous prime is 7300142999. The next prime is 7300143049. The reversal of 7300143041 is 1403410037.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 6075423025 + 1224720016 = 77945^2 + 34996^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 7300143041 - 230 = 6226401217 is a prime.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 7300142998 and 7300143016.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (7300143049) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 3650071520 + 3650071521.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3650071521).

Almost surely, 27300143041 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

7300143041 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

7300143041 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

7300143041 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1008, while the sum is 23.

The square root of 7300143041 is about 85440.8745332116. The cubic root of 7300143041 is about 1939.8900849088.

Adding to 7300143041 its reverse (1403410037), we get a palindrome (8703553078).

The spelling of 7300143041 in words is "seven billion, three hundred million, one hundred forty-three thousand, forty-one".