Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100100111100110110… |
… | …0000010101111000010 |
3 | 21120211002220110101000 |
4 | 1021321230002233002 |
5 | 2300002324000002 |
6 | 100241531152430 |
7 | 5506251241221 |
oct | 1117154025702 |
9 | 246732813330 |
10 | 79351000002 |
11 | 3071a63084a |
12 | 134665a5716 |
13 | 7637841051 |
14 | 3baa8b8cb8 |
15 | 20e652261c |
hex | 1279b02bc2 |
79351000002 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 178567660800. Its totient is φ = 26115517584.
The previous prime is 79350999989. The next prime is 79351000009. The reversal of 79351000002 is 20000015397.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (27).
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 79351000002.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (79351000009) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 9296133 + ... + 9304664.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5580239400).
Almost surely, 279351000002 is an apocalyptic number.
79351000002 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (99216660798).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
79351000002 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
79351000002 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 18600887 (or 18600881 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1890, while the sum is 27.
Adding to 79351000002 its reverse (20000015397), we get a palindrome (99351015399).
The spelling of 79351000002 in words is "seventy-nine billion, three hundred fifty-one million, two", and thus it is an aban number.
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.132 sec. • engine limits •